Posted in Books

Nobody’s perfect, but that doesn’t excuse privilege: Carve the Mark, Mosquitoland, and being a more conscious and careful reader

Happy Friday, bibliophiles! I’ve been writing out this post in my head since Tuesday night, so here goes nothing…

The other day, I was reading Aditi’s post about 20 of the most popular YA books on Goodreads. Veronica Roth’s Carve the Mark was among the ranks, and she mentioned that there had been several reviews saying that it had some racist elements, and had a problematic depiction of chronic illness. I had to do a bit of a double take; I read that book at least two years ago, but I didn’t remember anything like that. My whole memory of the book was hazy, really, and even though I’d given it a four star rating back then, it was probably one of those books I just sped through because I was just thinking something along the lines of “haha sci-fi go brrrrrrrrrrr”

Carve the Mark eBook by Veronica Roth - 9780062348654 | Rakuten Kobo United  States

And so I read some reviews–some from bloggers that I follow, some from strangers, and there were indeed a lot that pointed out several problematic elements and stereotypes. I found myself being incredibly ashamed of my past self for not noticing them. I’ve been going back and forth between removing my rating, and I never got to the sequel and thought Divergent was overrated, so I doubt I’ll be picking up a Veronica Roth book in the future. But I ended up putting myself between two spaces:

First off, nobody’s perfect. As much of an intersectional feminist that I strive to be, I still make mistakes. We all do. I’m sure everybody’s had an instance like this one.

But secondly, I still must acknowledge that I have privilege, and that this privilege is part of why I didn’t spot the highly questionable elements there. And since I am privileged, I have to do my best to better myself, and read more carefully, and become better at spotting and making note of problematic elements.

Amazon.com: Mosquitoland (9780147513656): Arnold, David: Books

I’d like to think that I’ve gotten better at reading carefully since I read Carve the Mark, but this example also jumped out at me as something that’s controversial. I read Mosquitoland a few months back; I thought it was a well-written novel, but there is some highly questionable–and I mean HIGHLY questionable and offensive representation of Down syndrome, and some problematic elements regarding the depiction of Native American characters, as well as some poor handling of sexual assault. I still hold the writing highly, but I know that I have to also recognize that Mosquitoland, though powerful, is still a deeply flawed novel. No matter its impact, there is NO excusing some of the content of this novel. (if you’re interested in someone else’s thoughts on the matter, I’d highly suggest checking out The Inside Cover’s Mosquitoland, Three Years Later: A Coda.)

All this got me thinking about reviews. Part of what’s key to reading/picking your reads more carefully is reading reviews before you dive in. Of course, you have to be careful to avoid reviews that have been paid to get a 4-5 star rating (for bias); the 3-2 star range is usually the most reliable source for me, as they usually cover the good and the bad in equal amounts. (1 stars tend to dive into rants, which I fully admit to doing, but it’s better to see both the pros and cons, personally.) It’s just like checking your news sources: seeing both sides of the argument, and getting perspectives from reviewers who have lived some of these experiences. It’s what made me take The State of Us off my TBR, and a few others.

An Absolutely Remarkable Thing: A Novel (The Carls): Green, Hank:  9781524743444: Amazon.com: Books

And sometimes, there’s no way out of it. I went into An Absolutely Remarkable Thing expecting a read as great as everybody seemed to say it was, but I ended up being infuriated by how poorly the bisexual representation was handled. (Personal opinion, here) Hardly anyone (except for one reviewer, so shoutout to them) noted the bury-your-gays trope, as well as the killing off of most of the POC characters (all but one or two) in Four Dead Queens. There will always be times when we’re roped into something problematic, even if we’ve read a variety of reviews.

Four Dead Queens - Astrid Scholte - 9781760524418 - Allen & Unwin -  Australia

The bottom line? Don’t beat yourself up about reading a problematic book, but don’t brush the problematic parts aside like they don’t exist. If you see something uncomfortable depicted in a novel, talk about it, whether it’s in the comments of a review or in a review of your own. Let your voice be heard, but recognize that all of us have at least a little bit of privilege.

Alright, let me step off the soapbox for a minute. I also have a short announcement: I have A BUNCH of books that I’d like to review soon, so as well as my Book Review Tuesdays, I’ll be packing several books into mini-reviews, starting next week. So stay tuned…

Today’s song:

That’s it for this post! Have a wonderful rest of your day, and take care of yourselves!

Author:

Your friendly neighborhood book/music/occasionally movie blogger who reads too fast and has an arsenal of absurd gifs at her disposal :) ⭐︎ I incessantly change my profile picture, you have been warned ⭐︎ she/her ⭐︎ ISTJ ⭐︎ (pfp by @KorinMalin from picrew)

13 thoughts on “Nobody’s perfect, but that doesn’t excuse privilege: Carve the Mark, Mosquitoland, and being a more conscious and careful reader

  1. This is a really thought provoking post, thank you for sharing your thoughts Madeline! One of the reasons I love book blogging is that it’s helped me towards being a more conscious reader in the way that you advocate. It’s always a work in progress, but I think the important thing is to keep moving in the right direction! X x x

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thanks so much! Yeah, no…everybody and their mother seemed to love it, but it felt simultaneously problematic and preachy? Like the internet just gave Hank Green all the harmful stereotypes about bi people (especially bi women) and he just regurgitated it…I’m still angry…
      Anyway, thanks so much! Your post definitely helped me along the way of realizing the full extent of how problematic Mosquitoland was, even though the Down syndrome rep was already a red flag. And I’m always here to support you! Thanks for the video rec! 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  2. YES! YES TO THIS POST! I’m so with you. It’s far too easy to criticise people for not seeing the problematic rep that a book has because it’s not their lived experience. And no one should ever feel bad that they didn’t see the harmful rep, because in most instances even the author is well intentioned. They didn’t go out to be hurtful. They tried their best.
    I’m one of the reviewers who tore down Carve the Mark on Goodreads back when it came out because of my lived experience with chronic pain. But a good friend read and enjoyed it at the same time. They didn’t see what I saw in the book and that was okay. And genuinely I think Roth tried her best with that book but got poor advice and feedback from beta readers, editors etc.
    I read All the Bright Places when it was first released. Sobbed my way through it. Thought it was beautiful… some time later I see all these reviews talking about its problematic mental health rep and my eyes were opened.
    I also read that Hank Green book you’re talking about, at least the first one in his series…that’s the book you’re referencing right? I 100% saw no issue with bisexual rep in it which now has me like damn what did I miss!
    So that’s one of the things I love about the book community and own voices reviewers. Because we can all educate each other and start these great conversations and dialogue about being more accepting and tolerant of those that have different lived experiences. Great post Madeline. 💚💖💜❤️💙💛

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thank you so much! Your review was one of the ones that I found after looking back at Carve the Mark, so thank you so much for the heads-up(s). Yeah, I could go on a whole rant about the bisexual rep…there was one paragraph in particular where it felt like Hank Green was trying to push really hard that he “did his research” or whatever, but it just ended up being a problematic dumpster fire, personally. And that’s why I love the book community–without them, I doubt I would have noticed some of these things. Thanks for the support! 💗 💗 💗

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I loved reading this post + your thoughts!! I’m so glad that something I wrote sparked this amazing discussion and thank you so much for linking the other posts so I could learn more about this Arnold guy and the rep in his books. I absolutely agree with you on the main takeaway from this post- don’t beat yourself up about reading a problematic book, but don’t brush the problematic parts aside 💜

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s